GRAVITY

THE ORIGIN OF GRAVITY

 https://www.advancedsciencenews.com/new-theory-suggests-gravity-is-not-a-fundamental-force/

I agree that gravity is not a fundamental force, as claimed in the linked article, and while the thrust of the thinking in that article is in the right direction in seeing gravity as arising “from the ‘quantum-level behavior of ordinary matter’”, …....

….... the theorists need a little assistance.

FUNDAMENTALS

The nominal electric charge of a single electron is given as:

1.60217663 X 10-19 coulomb's.

Should it becomes possible for human scientists to actually measure the charge of individual electrons, it will be found that, rather than being a constant, the charge of electrons is variable and is determined by external factors.

It will be learned that, in the dynamic measured environment, each electron will exhibit a charge ranging from something less than to something greater than the nominal figure.

The highest charge exhibited by a given electron can be taken to represent it being in a ‘fully charged’ condition [as distinct from a saturated condition – discussed elsewhere].

It will also be understood that, under ‘normal’ dynamic circumstances, few, if any electrons exist in this ‘fully charged’ state.

This means that the charge of atomic protons is not fully offset by the sum of the charges of their associated electrons.

CONCLUSION

The charge exhibited in close proximity to an atomic structure will be negative, as determined by its associated electrons and this charge will act to repel close proximity molecules, which themselves exhibit a near-field negative charge.

At a greater distance from the atomic nucleus however, the same molecule will exhibit a positive charge resulting from the remnant proton charge remaining uncancelled by a less than fully charged electron field.

This remnant positive atomic charge exists as an attractive force upon all electrons and electron-associated matter in the universe.

This is gravitational attraction.

Please note:

Richard Feynman said in his lectures:

“Suppose that we have two unlikes that attract each other, a plus and a minus, and that they stick very close together. Suppose we have another charge some distance away. Would it feel any attraction?

It would feel practically none, because if the first two are equal in size, the attraction for the one and the repulsion for the other balance out. Therefore there is very little force at any appreciable distance.

 

To give an idea of how much stronger electricity is than gravitation, consider two grains of sand, a millimeter across, thirty meters apart.

If the force between them were not balanced, if everything attracted everything else instead of likes repelling, so that there were no cancellation, how much force would there be? There would be a force of three million tons between the two!

You see, there is very, very little excess or deficit of the number of negative or positive charges necessary to produce appreciable electrical effects.”

 

The above quote illustrates how a small deficit of photons in an ‘electron’ can cause the ‘weak’ force known as gravity. It may be read as agreeing that ‘gravity’ is equivalent to an uncancelled very small residue of electrical charge.

The remaining un-neutralized residue of each atom’s positive electric field is viewed in this hypothesis as being responsible for the phenomenon known as gravity. If this is so, it can thus be seen that gravity may be viewed as a quantized phenomenon.

Although this is of course still the electric force, which is considered to be the ‘strong’ force, in this view of gravity we are looking at a small component only, merely a remnant of this force, arising from a photon deficit, hence the relative weakness of the attraction involved.

An understanding of the described phenomenon provides a clear view of the nature and mechanism of Gravity.