An Opportunity to Consider an Overlooked Possibility in Fundamental Physics

Regarding the article at https://forums.space.com/threads/einstein-wins-again-quarks-obey-relativity-laws-large-hadron-collider-finds.70166/

In his commentary on the matter, Unclear Engineer said:

"My thinking is that we are probably missing something important, so I support the research to look for things that might answer some of these questions."

"We will make progress faster if we don't fall into the trap of believing what we assume, so that we discard the thinking about other potential explanations."

My [Agnosco Ignis'] associated comment to https://forums.space.com said:

Regarding Time Dilation and Length Contraction:

I see these as concurrent effects of adding energy to matter [please bear with me]. The energy applied to the acceleration of matter alters the dynamics of the energy comprising that matter in such a manner as to cause physical events related to that matter to occur at a lower rate. This is equivalent to what is seen as a slowing of local time (time related to that particular matter).

Consider 'Time' as a measure of the rate at which physical events occur.

As a result, ALL physical events, such as those related to the ageing of a living creature, occur at a lower rate at a higher speed because 'event time', that is the portion of each 'period' available for 'things to happen' is reduced with increased speed.

An understanding of these concepts may be gained by anyone able to grok the hypothesis presented at:

https://photon-interactions.blogspot.com/2024/10/light-light-interactions-in-search-of.html  

and subsequently elaborated upon in an included link to deal with a range of concepts such as Time Dilation and the fundamental nature of the speed limitation imposed upon matter.

I'm most encouraged to read the thoughts of 'Unclear Engineer' as expressed in this article, who's thinking is far from unclear to me. Such an individual, seemingly unspoiled by formal quantum 'education' would be capable of dissecting 'Quantum Mechanics - A Classical Interpretation' to perhaps conclude, as did one American astrophysicist (sadly now deceased) that there is merit in the ideas presented. As a retired astrophysicist suffering from terminal cancer and no longer having any 'skin in the game' in terms of the profession, he wrote to me that after detailed close study and constant review he had been unable to find a flaw in the reasoning presented and insisted that I continued to promulgate my ideas.

Being fundamentally disruptive to current 'theories', this description of a Universe in which all sub-atomic level events comply with the fundamentals of classical physics has not been pursued by proponents of current theories despite its wide promulgation. Interestingly, over the period from publication of the website in February 2016 until now [February 2025], there has not been one counter argument put forward, let alone a logically reasoned one, despite direct approaches to many well known scientists requesting comment.

I invite Unclear Engineer and other keen minds present on this forum to critically consider the hypothesis I put forward and respond through this forum and/or to the email address found in the linked Blogger post.

Too simple to be true? Maybe so. Please let me know.

Agnosco

*******

My attempts to seek Unclear Engineer and other Space.com contributor consideration of this classical interpretation of quantum mechanics has been rebuffed.

Space.com site administrators refuse to permit any link allowing access to this hypothesis to be posted to the site.

Why is this?